Workshop review process for ACL, COLING, EMNLP, and NAACL 2018

Authors: Jason Williams (Microsoft Research) Brendan O’Connor (University of Massachusetts Amherst) Eva Maria Vecchi (University of Cambridge) Tim Baldwin (University of Melbourne) Yoav Goldberg (Bar Ilan University) Jing Jiang (Singapore Management University) Marie Meteer (Brandeis University) Marieke van Erp (KNAW Humanities Cluster) Vincent Ng (University of Texas at Dallas)   For approximately the last 10 … Continue reading Workshop review process for ACL, COLING, EMNLP, and NAACL 2018

Advertisement

Test-of-Time Paper Nominations, or, Classic Computational Linguistics Papers!

Thanks to the wonderful efforts by all area chairs, here are the classic computational linguistics papers nominated so far for the Test-of-Time Paper Award. The paper links are added now. If you are one of the 1000 productive authors, we will ask you to vote soon! Note on paper #18: this great paper by Amanda … Continue reading Test-of-Time Paper Nominations, or, Classic Computational Linguistics Papers!

Reject without Review: Avoidable Mistakes

We feel sorry at delivering bad news to the authors of 20 long papers during the holiday season. The reasons for rejecting these papers without review are as follows, hopefully it could help authors avoid similar mistakes for future submissions. Violated ACL Blind Review Policy: 2 papers include author name and affiliation under title, and … Continue reading Reject without Review: Avoidable Mistakes

Putting the Linguistics in Computational Linguistics

The wonderful NAACL 2018 PC co-chairs asked for a some thoughts on how to make a computational linguistics papers linguistically informative.  My take on this is that not all NAACL papers need to be linguistically informative—but they should all be linguistically informed.  Here are a four steps to achieving that, which I hope will be … Continue reading Putting the Linguistics in Computational Linguistics